The unfolding "design" is in respect of a process of systemic feedback and appreciation. Systemic feedback and appreciation seem to entail conscious determination. Unless one prefers to imagine that everything that can occur does occur somewhere or sometime in some universe.
That's not what anyone is saying.
Really? You read my comment?
You should see my temple shows. ;-)
Brothers Grimm, Aesop and so many others have useful stories to tell.
Obviously you do not have the first clue of the infinite character of God.
knock yourselves out, if you think you would be better off. we can still negotiate bilaterally with any of the countries involved in said trade deals.
It isn't which is why it is permissible as foreplay, but not as the main event.
Socialism is hunky-dory until you run out of everybody else's money. It's government run Social Security and healthcare that is breaking the bank in America. The isolated counties that have privatize Social Security end up getting more money at the end than the rest of us.
This topic reminds me of the time I took my male dog to the vet for a check up. It was after my other dog had to be put to sleep bc the cancer was taking her out. She was so damn skinny, it was horrible to witness her go from this beautiful muscular solid girl to a bag of bones.
*crossing fingers and toes*
Once we can calibrate the "super" natural it will be the "NATURAL"
it's been proven to me now 40 years...
It wasn't anywhere near as broad as "Israel" where use of Roman coin was a problem. It was one specific building and one specific activity.
No, sir. You are incorrect. Catholicism may be 80% pagan, but NOT Christianity. You need to get educated.
Just received an email advert for "matching parents and kids glasses"
I?ve been up all night though- that my excuse s???????? grogginess
It is wise to hide from the challenge. Let's make it easier, want to compare DD 214s?
You can provide link as reference, but I really want you to make your best case for Macro evolution and this is post #5/6? I'm asking for that. It's not rocket science, dude. It's not like the "Theory of Relativity". It's really very simplistic and basic, but the "evidence" isn't compelling. It's actually really ridiculous.
Like the Melania conspiracies?
Actually I think the "definition" (#1) part is valid for both of you. Theist and atheist alike often "redefine" what words mean, sometimes on the fly. I know many atheists hate the phrase "true Christian" because to them, it means there are 'false Christians,' which may monkey with that atheists' point. Theists, on the other hand, vary from person to person on what God of the bible is - Duality? Trinity? Singular? Spirit or physical? I think you get where I'm going...
On personal hiatus.