You've yet to post any facts, and your questions are easy to answer.
You?re going the long way around to explain it and using the subsequent success of Christianity?s message as a reason why they would have concocted it that way prospectively. Fact is, the Son of Man or the Messiah was not supposed to be killed, let alone humiliated. The Kingdom of God was supposed to occur on earth, imminently. I do not lack imagination, I can imagine all kinds of stories. The question here is what?s most likely.
It is absurd. Not only does this notion of God insist on a hide and seek game, "You must simply believe without evidence", but you must also suffer for believing it. What kind of sick sadistic monster would require such cruel nonsense.
Cant say I have known a Christian in 62 years who has ever been in the slightest violent towards anyone. Who are these Christians who do these things?
You might consider rereading the first couple of pages of the ruling, specifically those parts about
If you were on a date and things went really well, how would you signal to your date that you wanted to make whoopie?
Do you really want to force the bigot to bake your cake? Do you really think he'll do the best job for you? Blacks had a little bit more serious problem that who was going to bake their wedding cake, so I call bogus on that analogy.
Being a newborn is not a sin. Being a sinner is not a sin. Sinning is a sin.
I am a bit surprised you aren't accusing the PC's of colluding with Russia....
I disagree. If you know killing is wrong, you will feel regret if you do it, which may affect whether you do it again.
I know what an atheist is, but it requires the ability to believe.
That's not what the bible tells us...